Exploring the different types of feedback in e-learning
Read time : 6 minutes
Not so long ago, many e-learning exercises were plagued by the infamous ‘Correct, good job’ and ‘Incorrect, please try again’ types of feedback.
In this article, we’ll explore the various types of feedback that can be incorporated into e-learning exercises. From the simplest “Correct/Incorrect” responses to detailed narrative feedback that highlights the long-term consequences of learners’ decisions, feedback can serve as a powerful tool for engaging learners and enhancing their understanding. Let’s dive into the spectrum of feedback types, their strengths, and practical examples of how each can be applied.
Summary table
Feedback type | Description | Best use case |
---|---|---|
Minimalist | Simply indicates if an answer is correct or incorrect. | Memorization tasks (e.g., capitals, flags) |
Short explanation | Adds a brief explanation of why the answer is correct/incorrect. | Conceptual understanding (e.g., multiple-choice questions) |
Direct consequence | Shows the immediate results of a decision. | Procedural tasks (e.g., compliance, troubleshooting) |
Long-term consequence | Explains the broader, systemic outcomes of decisions over time. | Strategic decision-making (e.g., leadership, ethics, customer relationship) |
1. The Minimalist
The simplest form of feedback, this approach informs learners whether their response is correct or incorrect without any further elaboration. Think of it as “This is good” or “This is bad.” It provides immediate clarity, making it suitable for quick knowledge checks or recall exercises.
This type of feedback is like the e-learning equivalent of a red pen: you either got it right, or you didn’t. While this might seem like the least engaging form of feedback (and, let’s be honest, it often is), it has its place when used thoughtfully. Its strength lies in its speed and simplicity, which can help learners maintain momentum without bogging them down in unnecessary details.
But here’s the catch: minimalism works best in situations where the answer is self-explanatory, or where additional explanation would be redundant. For instance, if you’re asking someone to identify the capital of France, they don’t need a paragraph about how Paris became the capital in the 10th century—unless, of course, your objective is to teach French history rather than basic geography.
Example
Scenario: A customer calls in frustrated about receiving the wrong product.
- Correct Answer (Apologize and ship the correct product): “Correct.”
- Incorrect Answer (Ask for the product to be returned first): “Incorrect.”
- Incorrect Answer (Offer a partial refund): “Incorrect.”
How to improve it
To make the minimalist approach more learner-friendly:
- Use it sparingly. Over-reliance on “Correct/Incorrect” feedback can leave learners feeling frustrated or disengaged, particularly in scenarios requiring nuance or deeper understanding.
- Pair it with other forms of feedback. For example, use minimalist feedback during quick pre-tests or review exercises, then transition to more detailed explanations in subsequent questions or scenarios.
- Use positive reinforcement. Even a simple “Correct!” can be elevated with a touch of encouragement: “Correct! Well done.” This keeps the feedback from feeling overly clinical.
When to use it
The minimalist approach is best for factual or procedural learning objectives where learners can infer the reasoning themselves. It’s great for quick assessments, reinforcing straightforward knowledge, or keeping a fast-paced learning experience on track.
2. The short explanation
Essentially an improved version of the minimalist approach, this type of feedback doesn’t stop at indicating whether an answer is correct or incorrect—it adds a short, factual explanation to help learners understand why their response was right or wrong. It’s the feedback equivalent of a helpful nudge in the right direction, providing just enough context for learners to course-correct without overwhelming them with information.
This is the bread and butter of multiple-choice questions, and for good reason: it’s effective, efficient, and provides an immediate opportunity for learning. If a learner selects the wrong answer, the short explanation helps them identify their mistake and move forward with clarity. If they’re correct, the explanation reinforces their knowledge and builds confidence.
Example
Scenario: A customer calls in frustrated about receiving the wrong product.
- Correct Answer (Apologize and ship the correct product):
“Correct! Apologizing and shipping the correct product is a fast and effective way to resolve the issue and maintain customer satisfaction.” - Incorrect Answer (Ask for the product to be returned first):
“Incorrect. Asking for the product to be returned first may cause unnecessary delays and further frustrate the customer.” - Incorrect Answer (Offer a partial refund):
“Incorrect. Offering a partial refund does not fully resolve the issue and could result in a dissatisfied customer.”
How to improve it
- Tailor the explanation to the learner’s choice. Instead of providing a single generic explanation, address the learner’s specific mistake. This makes the feedback feel more personalized and actionable.
- Anticipate common misconceptions. Use the feedback as an opportunity to clear up misunderstandings. If the incorrect choice seems logical but is based on a common error, explain why it doesn’t work.
- Incorporate links to additional resources. For example, learners could be offered a link to a short video or a reference guide if they want to dig deeper into the topic.
- Adapt the feedback dynamically. If a learner makes multiple mistakes in a row, the explanations can evolve to provide more detailed or supportive guidance, such as, “It seems like this concept is tricky—here’s a tip: focus on customer satisfaction first before considering logistical steps.”
When to use it
The short explanation approach is perfect for conceptual understanding or building foundational knowledge. It’s especially useful in cases where learners need just a little more context to make sense of their mistakes, but not so much that it slows down the pace of the course. Think problem-solving exercises, compliance training, or any scenario where learners benefit from quick, actionable insights.
3. The direct consequence
This feedback type focuses on showing learners the immediate result of their decision. Unlike the minimalist or short explanation approaches, which stop at highlighting correctness or explaining why, direct consequence feedback answers the question: “What happens as a result of your choice right now?”
This approach shines in scenarios where cause and effect are crystal clear. It’s the feedback equivalent of turning on a lightbulb: learners immediately see the impact of their actions, helping them connect decisions to outcomes in a way that’s practical and easy to grasp.
Direct consequence feedback works well when the objective is to mirror real-world processes or systems. For example, if a compliance officer skips a critical step in an anti-money laundering process, they might immediately miss a red flag. Similarly, if a customer service agent makes the wrong call, the customer might leave the interaction more frustrated than before. By linking choices to results, learners can see why their decision matters in the moment.
Example
Scenario: A customer calls in frustrated about receiving the wrong product.
- Correct Answer (Apologize and ship the correct product):
“By apologizing and shipping the correct product immediately, you resolved the customer’s issue quickly. They expressed appreciation for your prompt action.” - Incorrect Answer (Ask for the product to be returned first):
“Asking the customer to return the product caused further frustration. They felt the process was unnecessarily complicated and time-consuming.” - Incorrect Answer (Offer a partial refund):
“Offering a partial refund failed to resolve the core issue. The customer was disappointed and stated they would consider shopping elsewhere in the future.”
Notice how this feedback doesn’t just tell the learner if they were right or wrong—it shows them exactly what happens as a result of their choice. By anchoring feedback in the scenario, learners gain a tangible sense of cause and effect.
How to improve it
- Visualize the outcome. Consider adding a short animation or graphic to show the consequence (e.g., a happy customer smiling or a frustrated customer leaving a negative review). Visual reinforcement makes the feedback more engaging and memorable.
- Include performance metrics. Tie the immediate consequence to a measurable result, such as a customer satisfaction score, compliance rating, or efficiency percentage. For example:
“By shipping the correct product immediately, your resolution time improved by 50%, leading to a 5-star review.” - Simulate urgency. Make the scenario feel realistic by emphasizing the stakes. For instance:
“The delay in resolving the issue led to negative feedback being shared on social media within hours, damaging the company’s reputation.”
When to use it
Direct consequence feedback is perfect for procedural training, troubleshooting exercises, or decision-making tasks. If your goal is to show learners the real-time implications of their choices, this is the way to go. However, it’s not ideal for situations where the full impact of a decision takes time to unfold—those are better suited to long-term consequence feedback.
4. The long term consequence
Unlike feedback that focuses on immediate outcomes, long-term consequence feedback emphasizes the lasting impact of a learner’s decisions. It shows how choices made in the moment can shape outcomes over days, months, or even years, offering a deeper understanding of how actions reverberate over time. By helping learners connect their decisions to future consequences, this approach fosters critical thinking and strategic foresight.
Long-term consequence feedback is ideal for complex scenarios where decisions aren’t just about immediate results, but also about how those choices impact systems, relationships, or outcomes down the line. For example, a manager’s response to an underperforming team member might seem effective in the short term, but could lead to disengagement or turnover over the following months. Similarly, a poorly handled customer service case might harm a company’s reputation weeks or months later. This feedback style helps learners connect the dots between their actions and the bigger picture.
Example
Scenario: A customer calls in frustrated about receiving the wrong product.
- Correct Answer (Apologize and ship the correct product):
“By resolving the issue quickly, the customer felt valued and left a glowing review online. Over the next six months, they referred several friends to your company, becoming a loyal, high-value customer. Your prompt action also helped improve your team’s overall customer satisfaction rating, strengthening the company’s reputation.” - Incorrect Answer (Ask for the product to be returned first):
“Your decision to request the product return before shipping the replacement frustrated the customer. Although they eventually received the correct product, they left a mixed review online, citing inconvenience. Over time, they shopped less frequently with your company and began exploring alternatives.” - Incorrect Answer (Offer a partial refund):
“The customer accepted the refund but remained dissatisfied. They shared their negative experience online, discouraging potential customers from shopping with your company. This feedback hurt your company’s reputation and led to a measurable decline in new customer sign-ups over the following quarter.”
This feedback paints a fuller picture, allowing learners to reflect on how their immediate decisions create a domino effect of events. It challenges them to think strategically and anticipate the broader consequences of their actions.
How to improve it
- Use a story-driven approach. Narratives are a powerful way to help learners emotionally connect with the outcomes of their decisions. For example, describe the customer’s journey from dissatisfaction to switching to a competitor, or from delight to becoming a brand advocate.
- Show cascading impacts. Tie the learner’s decision to multiple effects across different levels—such as team performance, customer trust, and organizational reputation. For instance:
“Your decision not only impacted the customer directly, but also strained your team’s resources and damaged the company’s long-term trust metrics.” - Incorporate metrics or trends. Quantify the long-term effects to make them feel real. For example:
“Over the next six months, your resolution rate increased by 15%, but customer retention dropped by 10% due to lingering dissatisfaction.” - Introduce time skips. Use a “flash-forward” technique to show what happens weeks, months, or even years later. This creates a cinematic feel that keeps learners engaged.
When to use it
Long-term consequence feedback is ideal for trainings where the true value of the desired behavior may not be immediately obvious to the learner. It works best in scenarios where the benefits—or drawbacks—of an action unfold over time, making it unsuitable for direct consequence-style feedback. This approach is particularly effective in strategic decision-making, leadership training, or ethical dilemmas, where learners must understand the broader implications of their choices and how they align with long-term goals or organizational outcomes.
Getting started with SceneHero
SceneHero offers an easy and intuitive way to create and deploy such projects, with its simple no-code, graphical interface.
